So Archbishop Rowan Williams has been completely mauled in the press in the last week and a half. It certainly hasn't been pretty to watch, and I found my blood boiling during last week's edition of the BBC's The Big Questions. Some of the so-called 'experts' were completely rude, vile, hateful and even made fools of themselves in some cases. One of them (I believe he was from the centre for social cohesion) turned into an incoherent throbbing tomato when talking to the Sheikh regarding the issue. Now I'm not saying that the Sheikh was completely right either. I think the best way to do this would be to write my opinions on the matter, so here goes:
I think that Muslims should be given the option to practice certain aspects of Shari'a law if they so desire, if, and only if, this is carried out in the correct framework of human rights and national law. The scare stories of the tabloids about women being flogged for being alone in male company are in fact irrelevant to the issue. Yes, this is an aspect of Shari'a practiced in some countries, but it would not form a part of any official implementation of Shari'a. The two main aspects which would be covered would be to do with finance and divorce.
I'll start with the latter, and I would urge anyone interested in this to watch a documentary available on 4 OD called Divorce: Shari'a Style which shows how it is currently practiced. Basically, for men an Islamic divorce entails the 'triple talaq', where a man has to say talaq to his wife on three separate occassions in order to dissolve the marriage in religious terms. For women, it is slightly more complicated, in that they need to convince a religious elder to grant the dissolution of the marriage in religious terms. However, this is for the religious aspect of the divorce, to be fully legally binding under British law a civil divorce which goes through the courts must also occur. Some Muslims feel that a) they will get 'divorced' quicker through a Shari'a court or b) they want to make peace with their divorce and their religion.
Secondly, finance. The issues relating this are derived from the prohibition of usury in Islam, so things like mortgages become a bit difficult. The solutions have been in place in some High Street banks for a while, so that isn't really a big issue.
If those two issues do form part of the law (although in a way they already do!) then I for one have my voice counted as among those supporting the move.
However, we do need to safeguard against some of the more extremist positions of certain people, such as that of the Sheikh on The Big Questions that theives should have their hands cut off. Not only do I find it inhumane to mutilate a person in such a way, but I disagree with his argument that it will act as a deterrent. Has he not looked at the murder statistics in American states which implement the death penalty?!
Oh, and a final word completely unrelated to the above - congratulations to Miss Samantha Davies Dip Mus T. I shall call her Miss T from now on and lavish tasteless gold chains upon her, as well as encouraging the mohican look. ;)
Over and out. :)
Latest news
4 hours ago